Paxil - Jury Verdicts

______ VERDICT FOR CONSCIOUS PAIN AND SUFFERING - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - FAILURE OF EMERGENCY ROOM PHYSICIAN TO APPRECIATE HAZARDS POSED BY SPONTANEOUS BLEEDING FROM DIALYSIS SITE SEVERAL DAYS AFTER PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED - PATIENT ADVISED TO RETURN HOME AND SEE NEPHROLOGIST THE FOLLOWING DAY - DEATH FROM EXSANGUINATION DURING OVERNIGHT HOURS.
@INTRO = This was a medical malpractice/death action involving a 58-year-old female long term dialysis patient who presented with signs of bleeding from the dialysis shunt several days after undergoing treatment. The plaintiff contended that the defendant emergency room physician negligently failed to appreciate that such bleeding is an ominous sign and that after bandaging the area,...
- from The New York Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (47757) Login for Paxil Verdict
______ VERDICT - PSYCHIATRIC MALPRACTICE - ALLEGED FAILURE TO PERFORM APPROPRIATE PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT - ALLEGED FAILURE TO FOLLOW-UP ON EXPRESSION OF SUICIDAL IDEATION - WRONGFUL DEATH BY SUICIDE.
This action was brought by the estate of the 43-year-old female decedent against the defendant psychiatrist and the defendant's practice group. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendant psychiatrist failed to perform an appropriate psychiatric assessment or follow-up on suicidal ideation and otherwise failed to render treatment which would have prevented the decedent's subseque...
- from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (26765) Login for Paxil Verdict
______ VERDICT Failure to diagnose and treat cardiac arrhythmia - Premature discharge from hospital - Wrongful death of 25-year-old woman.
The decedent was a 25-year-old female when she was treated at the emergency room after collapsing at home. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant family physician, who was called to the hospital, prematurely discharged the decedent and failed to order diagnostic studies which would have revealed cardiac arrhythmia.

The decedent died of cardiac arrhythmia within 24 hours of ...
- from The Florida Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (445) Login for Paxil Verdict
______ VERDICT - PSYCHIATRIC MALPRACTICE - ALLEGED NEGLIGENT MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT - FAILURE OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST AND PSYCHIATRIST TO HOSPITALIZE PATIENT AFTER SUICIDE ATTEMPT - DEATH BY LEAP FROM BRIDGE.
This action involved the suicide of David Lincoln on November 11, 1996, when he jumped from a bridge into the Susquehanna River. The defendants in the case included a clinical psychologist and psychiatrist who treated the decedent. The plaintiff, the decedent's wife as administratix of his estate, alleged that the defendants failed to prevent the suicide by hospitalizing her husba...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (28901) Login for Paxil Verdict
______ VERDICT - PSYCHIATRIC MALPRACTICE - ALLEGED NEGLIGENT MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT - FAILURE OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST AND PSYCHIATRIST TO HOSPITALIZE PATIENT AFTER SUICIDE ATTEMPT - DEATH BY LEAP FROM BRIDGE.
This action involved the suicide of David Lincoln on November 11, 1996, when he jumped from a bridge into the Susquehanna River.

The defendants in the case included a clinical psychologist and psychiatrist who treated the decedent. The plaintiff, the decedent's wife as administratix of his estate, alleged that the defendants failed to prevent the suicide by hospitalizing her ...
- from The Pennsylvania Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (40862) Login for Paxil Verdict
______ VERDICT - PREMISES LIABILITY - ABSENCE OF CENTER RAIL ON PORTION OF DEFENDANT SEASIDE RESTAURANT/TAVERN'S DECK SITUATED FIVE FEET ABOVE SEAWALL - CHAIR SLIDES BACKWARDS OFF DECK AS PLAINTIFF SITS IN IT - CONCUSSION - POST-CONCUSSION SYNDROME - EXTENSIVE COGNITIVE DEFICITS - PSYCHOLOGICAL OVERLAY.
The female plaintiff, a 52-year-old patron of the defendant seaside restaurant/tavern, contended that the defendant negligently failed to either cordon off or provide warnings that a section of its deck was being expanded, and unlike the remainder of the deck, did not contain a middle railing in between the top and bottom railings of the deck which was situated some five feet a...
- from The New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (32770) Login for Paxil Verdict
______ RECOVERY AFTER $3,000,000 VERDICT -MALPRACTICE BY OB/GYN WHO PERFORMED SUBTOTAL HYSTERECTOMY ON 19- YEAR-OLD PLAINTIFF WHO EXPERIENCED UTERINE ATONY WITH HEMORRHAGING AFTER DELIVERY OF BABY BY C-SECTION - DAMAGES SOUGHT FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EMOTIONAL INJURIES ONLY.
On the morning of August 19, 2001, the 19-year-old plaintiff presented at the defendant hospital, Beth Israel Medical Center, for delivery of her first child. She was administered increasing amounts of Pitocin ordered by the defendant attending physician. Her cervix proceeded to dilate over several hours when the dilation then arrested with signs of swelling. A C-section was ordered a...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (42190) Login for Paxil Verdict

Content provided by JVRA.com. LegalView is not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided above.


Need A Paxil Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Was Your Health Negatively Affected?

Please Describe the Injury

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Paxil Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Paxil case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * Unsafe Drugs: Paxil Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.

This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.